The Intel Inside for BCI
Real-time, Explainable Neural Inference
What is a BCI?
A Direct Pathway Between Brain and Machine
A Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) is a technology that captures brain signals, analyzes them, and translates them into commands that are relayed to an output device to carry out a desired action.
Essentially, BCI allows for the direct control of computers or other devices using only thought.
From non-invasive EEG headsets to implantable neural interfaces.
Non-Invasive BCI
(e.g., EEG Headset)
Invasive BCI
(e.g., Neural Implant)
Slide 3: The Problem
The BCI Revolution Faces a Bottleneck
High latency (100–300ms)
Breaks immersion — low latency is a hard requirement for viable BCI products.
Low adaptability
Static models can't track changing brain states; retraining costs $10K–$50K per clinical session.
Black-box models
Uninterpretable outputs block regulatory approval and erode user trust.
These bottlenecks stall adoption across medicine, assistive tech, and VR/AR.
- High Latency: A 100–300ms gap between thought and action breaks immersion and usability. At that delay, the brain perceives a disconnect — making low latency not a feature, but a hard requirement for any viable BCI product.
- Low Adaptability: Static models can't track the brain's changing states. Retraining costs $10K–$50K per session clinically, plus weeks of engineering time — making iteration prohibitively expensive.
- The "Black Box" Issue: Uninterpretable models block regulatory approval and erode user trust.
Together, these bottlenecks stall adoption across medicine, assistive technology, and immersive VR/AR.
Slide 4: Our Technological Core
Introducing Nimbus SDK: The Reactive Inference Engine
Nimbus SDK is a production-ready inference engine built for real-time brain signal processing. Unlike static ML models, it runs probabilistic models that continuously update as new data arrives — adapting to the brain's changing states without retraining.
At its core, Nimbus SDK uses reactive message passing on factor graphs — a technique pioneered by our team through RxInfer, an open-source Bayesian inference library developed by Lazy Dynamics, our co-founding company.
docs.nimbusbci.com →<10ms Inference Latency
Real-time processing of EEG and neural signals with sub-10ms end-to-end latency.
Continuous Adaptation
Models update on every new sample — no retraining cycles, no downtime.
Interpretable by Design
Probabilistic outputs with uncertainty estimates — built for regulatory transparency.
Slide 5: The Competitive Landscape
Why BCI Processing Methods Fall Short
| Criterion | LDA | SVM | Deep Learning | Bayesian Inference on NimbusSDK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Real-time Performance | High Very fast for simple, linear problems. | Medium Slower inference, especially with complex kernels. | Low Computationally heavy, often requires offline processing. | High (Reactive) Designed for streaming data and continuous updates. |
| Adaptability | Low A static model that must be fully retrained. | Medium Can be adapted, but it's often complex and inefficient. | Medium Requires large new datasets and extensive retraining. | High (By Design) Continuously learns and updates from new data points. |
| Robustness (to noise) | Low Highly sensitive to outliers and noisy signals. | Medium More robust than LDA but can still be affected. | Medium Can learn to ignore noise but requires vast data. | High (Explicit Modeling) Models uncertainty directly, making it resilient to noise. |
| Interpretability | High Feature contributions are clear and understandable. | Medium-Low Becomes a "black box" with non-linear kernels. | Very Low ("Black Box") Decision-making process is completely opaque. | Very High ("White Box") The entire model structure and reasoning is transparent. |
Full LDA / SVM / deep-learning comparison on tablet and desktop.
Benchmark Validation
Same Accuracy. 1000× Faster Compute.
Session-to-session adaptation is one of the biggest challenges in EEG. Nimbus updates user-specific models in milliseconds while maintaining benchmark accuracy.
BNCI 2014-004 motor imagery · frozen CSP · CPU batch=1 · nimbusbench S3
~Same
Adapting-head accuracy
~10×
Cheaper updates vs sklearn LDA
~1000×
Cheaper updates vs PyTorch MLP
Latency chart shown on tablet/desktop — key speedups above.
Slide 6: The Solution: RxInfer Inside
Real-time, Explainable Inference for BCI
We are building an SDK/API powered by RxInfer to serve as the core processing engine for the next generation of BCI devices.
Factor Graphs
For "white box" models that regulators and users can trust.
Variational Inference
For scalable computation balancing accuracy and speed.
Reactive Message Passing
For adaptive, real-time performance on streaming data.
The result: We reduce BCI latency from over 200ms to a target of 10-20ms.
Slide 7: Product Offering
The "Intel Inside" for Neurotechnology
- A Core Engine: A powerful inference engine deployable in the cloud or at the edge.
- Pre-built Models: A library of models for common BCI paradigms (e.g., motor imagery, SSVEP, P300).
- Developer Tools: A comprehensive SDK and API for seamless integration into any neurotech stack.
Slide 8: Visual Pipeline Builder
⚡ Key Features:
Slide 9: Nimbus Studio Competitors
Why Existing Tools Fall Short
NeuroPype
Limitation $2,000–$5,000/year, desktop-only, no embeddable SDK
Nimbus 10× cheaper, web-based, embeddable SDK for hardware partners
OpenBCI GUI
Limitation No ML pipeline, no model training, visualization only
Nimbus Full ML pipeline from offline training to real-time deployment
MNE-Python
Limitation Code-only, requires deep Python expertise, no visual interface
Nimbus Visual drag-and-drop interface accessible to non-coders
MATLAB / BCILAB
Limitation Expensive license ($2K–$5K/year), legacy codebase, no cloud
Nimbus Modern cloud-native stack, no license fees, open integration
Custom dev team
Limitation $120K+/year per developer, 12–18 months to first working prototype
Nimbus SDK co-development at a fraction of the cost, 6× faster to market
| Alternative | Limitation | Nimbus Advantage |
|---|---|---|
| NeuroPype | $2,000–$5,000/year, desktop-only, no embeddable SDK | 10× cheaper, web-based, embeddable SDK for hardware partners |
| OpenBCI GUI | No ML pipeline, no model training, visualization only | Full ML pipeline from offline training to real-time deployment |
| MNE-Python | Code-only, requires deep Python expertise, no visual interface | Visual drag-and-drop interface accessible to non-coders |
| MATLAB / BCILAB | Expensive license ($2K–$5K/year), legacy codebase, no cloud | Modern cloud-native stack, no license fees, open integration |
| Custom dev team | $120K+/year per developer, 12–18 months to first working prototype | SDK co-development at a fraction of the cost, 6× faster to market |
No existing tool combines a visual interface, Bayesian probabilistic outputs, and an embeddable hardware SDK in a single platform.
Slide 10: Target Customers
Three Validated Customer Segments
S1 Researchers & BCI consumers $49–199/mo
Validation ✓ 80+ on waiting list (zero marketing)
Who Postdocs, PI-led labs, enthusiasts, r/neuralinterfaces community
Channel Academic conferences, Discord, NeurotechX, r/neuralinterfaces
S2 BCI hardware startups $20K–150K
Validation ✓ BrainBit & PiEEG codevelopment contract
Who BrainBit, PiEEG, and similar hardware-first neurotech companies
Channel Direct outreach, BCI Society events, hardware accelerators
S3 Clinical teams (Q4 2026) $6K–60K/yr
Validation Planned Q4 2026 enterprise tier
Who Medical device manufacturers, hospital neuro departments, clinical research orgs
Channel Enterprise direct sales, medical device conferences, regulatory consultants
Researchers, PhD Students & BCI Consumers
BCI Hardware Startups
Medical Device & Clinical Teams
Slide 11: Market Size & Growth
A $400 Billion Market Opportunity in the US Alone
~$400B
Total US TAM
BCI implants — Morgan Stanley, 2024
$50–100M
SAM 2025
$500M–1B
@ 5% pen.
$1–2B+
Maturity
$80.8B
Early TAM
~2.8M patients with critical impairments (ALS, stroke, SCI, epilepsy, depression)
First-wave adopters — horizon: 2035
$320B
Intermediate TAM
~6.8M follow-on adopters with moderate impairments as technology matures
Follow-on wave — horizon: 2045
~$400B
Total US TAM
Combined addressable market for BCI implants in the United States
Source: Morgan Stanley BCI Primer, 2024 →▶ Nimbus Addressable Segment — The Software Layer Inside Every BCI Device
$50–100M
SAM Today (2025)
Developer tools & pipeline software for BCI labs and researchers
$500M–$1B
SAM at 5% BCI Penetration
SDK royalties + Studio SaaS as BCI devices reach early clinical scale
$1B–$2B+
SAM at Market Maturity
Per-unit royalties across millions of deployed BCI devices globally
Slide 12: Business Model
Two Independent Revenue Streams
1 Nimbus Studio SaaS $49–199/mo
ModelFreemium SaaS for researchers & BCI consumers
Validation✓ 80+ waiting list
2 Nimbus SDK $20K–150K
ModelB2B co-development + per-unit royalties
Validation✓ BrainBit & PiEEG contract
Nimbus Studio
Freemium SaaS — researchers & BCI consumers
$49 – $199
/month per seat
- ✓Free tier — unlimited pipeline building, community support
- ✓Pro ($49/mo) — real-time execution, export, priority support
- ✓Team ($199/mo) — shared workspaces, advanced models, SLA
✓ 80+ on waiting list — zero paid marketing
Nimbus SDK
B2B co-development — hardware startups
$20K – $150K
per contract + equity/royalties
- ✓9-month co-development — full team + advisors access
- ✓RxInfer Pro license — embedded in partner hardware
- ✓Per-unit royalty — recurring revenue on every device shipped
✓ 1 commercial codevelopment contract: BrainBit & PiEEG
Slide 13: Partnership Model
We are the adaptive layer of the BCI stack.
Applications
motor imagery · P300 · assistive · VR
Adaptive layer
Nimbus SDK
Bayesian BCI inference
Deep learning
learned, end-to-end
Device middleware
streaming · filters · vendor SDK
Hardware
headsets · amplifiers · edge compute
Sensors
EEG · fNIRS · implants
- Nimbus SDK
- device middleware
- stack layers
Nimbus SDK is our on-device inference engine for brain-computer interfaces. Hardware partners plug it in as the adaptive layer — closing the Sense → Learn → Act loop through your device stack, without hiring an ML team or shipping frozen end-to-end models.
What’s unique — it knows what it doesn’t know, so it can:
Gates decisions by confidence
Posteriors and entropy drive rejection and usable throughput.
Stays robust in noisy sessions
Uncertainty-aware decoding when electrodes slip or signal quality drops.
Adapts to neural drift
Online updates across trials — no weekly refit or cloud retraining.
-
Gates decisions by confidence
Posteriors and entropy drive rejection and usable throughput — not just the top class.
-
Stays robust in noisy sessions
Uncertainty-aware decoding when electrodes slip or signal quality drops.
-
Adapts to neural drift
Online updates across trials — no weekly refit or cloud retraining.
Slide 15: Traction
Early Validation — Before Funding
80+
Waiting List
Researchers & labs signed up with zero paid marketing
1
Commercial contract
Signed codevelopment with BrainBit & PiEEG — Nimbus SDK on hardware roadmap
✓
Live Product
Nimbus Studio publicly accessible with working pipeline builder
RxInfer.jl — 500+ GitHub stars, used in 10+ academic publications
The inference engine powering Nimbus already has proven scientific traction
Advisory board with Jeff Beck (Duke), Ryan Smith (LIBR), Bert de Vries (TU/e), Alexander Kuck
World-class scientific and industry validation secured
Nimbus SDK & Nimbus Studio — production-ready
Both core products are built and available for partner integration today
Slide 16: Revenue Projections
Path to $1.1M+ ARR by Year 3
Year 1
$7K
Studio: Free beta — 0 revenue
SDK: 1 co-dev contract ($7K)
Year 2
$50K
Studio: early Pro adoption — $10K/yr
SDK: 1–2 contracts — $40K
Year 3
$1.1M+
Studio: 300 seats — $770K/yr
SDK: 3+ contracts — $300K+
Upside: $4.5M ARR by Year 3
If one SDK partner ships 10,000+ devices with per-unit royalty, or enterprise clinical tier launches on schedule in Q4 2026, cumulative Year 3 revenue reaches $4.5M. This is structurally similar to the Arm licensing model applied to BCI hardware.
Slide 17: Fundraising
Raising $500K Pre-Seed
The ask
$500K
Pre-seed round (USD)
Use of funds
Product & inference hardening, benchmarks, and developer docs.
Partner delivery with BrainBit & PiEEG integration milestones.
Convert the 80+ researcher waitlist into Studio revenue.
Senior inference engineers and partner-facing technical hires.
The ask
$500K
Pre-seed round (USD)
Accelerate Nimbus Studio toward paid launch, scale the RxInfer-powered SDK for OEM partners, and fund execution on the signed BrainBit & PiEEG hardware codevelopment track.
- Product & inference: production-hardening, latency and reliability benchmarks, developer docs.
- Partner delivery: SDK integration milestones with hardware teams and pipeline-to-device tooling.
- Go-to-market: convert the validated researcher waitlist into recurring Studio revenue.
- Team: senior inference / tooling engineers and partner-facing technical roles.
Slide 18: The Team
Our Founding Team & Expertise
Slide 19: Advisory Board
Guidance from World-Class Scientists
For context: Yann LeCun (ex-Meta Chief AI Scientist) averages ~50K citations/year on Google Scholar.
Jeff Beck
Professor of Computational Neuroscience
Duke University
7,169 total citations
~360/year • h-index 28
Computational neuroscience & Bayesian brain models. Co-author of landmark paper cited 1,955×.
Ryan Smith
Research Associate Professor
Laureate Institute for Brain Research
8,229 total citations
~1,400/year • h-index 48
Active Inference & BCI translation. Collaborates with Karl Friston (UCL).
Bert de Vries
Professor of Signal Processing & ML
Eindhoven University of Technology
3,603 total citations
~95/year • h-index 26
Co-founder of GN Hearing (Jabra). Creator of RxInfer.jl — the core engine of Nimbus.
Alexander Kuck
Principal Engineer
Medtronic
Industry practitioner
Neurotechnology & medical devices
Expert in BCI hardware integration, medical device software, and neurotechnology commercialization.
Thank You
Let's build the future of neurotechnology together.